Today, CSF and PET measurements of Aß and tau pathology are valuable tools to aid the understanding of AD, and can be used to improve the accuracy of clinical AD diagnosis.1 However, the availability of PET and CSF AD biomarkers is limited and can be very costly (PET) or invasive (CSF).1 As a result, their use in clinical practice is likely to be restricted to more specialized centres.1 The development of blood-based biomarkers offers potential benefit over those currently available.5 Before these biomarkers are implemented in the clinic, several steps such as development of automated assays and establishment of universal cut-offs for abnormality are required.5 Additionally, optimization of diagnostic algorithms that combine different blood-based biomarkers and other easily accessible and cost-effective tools will allow individualized prediction of AD dementia in patients with mild cognitive symptoms.1 For patients with lower probability of neurodegenerative disease, follow-up in primary care may monitor the progression or improvement of symptoms, and consider alternative treatable conditions that may be contributing to symptoms.1 For patients with higher probability of neurodegenerative disease, more advanced clinical assessments may be carried out to determine the most probable neurodegenerative disease diagnosis.1 This would then allow the initiation of appropriate treatment and care.1
References:
1.Hansson O. Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Med 2021; 27 (6): 954–963.
