The graphs on the slide summarise some of the data from a web-based study in the USA that compared direct and indirect costs of episodic and chronic migraine.[Messali et al., 2016] From 2,143 responders to the survey (68.1% response rate), 1,205 patients with migraine were included in the analysis: 1,101 patients with episodic migraine, and 104 patients with chronic migraine (one of whom was not included in the analyses presented on the slide).[Messali et al., 2016] The mean annual total (direct and indirect) cost of headache among patients with chronic migraine was $8,243, compared with $2,649 among patients with episodic migraine.[Messali et al., 2016]

A systematic literature review of the impact of migraine on workplace productivity found many studies highlighting the deleterious effect of migraine on productivity.[Burton et al., 2009] As stated on the slide, the review found good evidence that certain treatments reduced productivity losses.[Burton et al., 2009] However, the effect of preventive migraine treatment on lost productivity at work was less consistent, with some studies reporting a small but significant improvement, whilst others found no significant difference.[Burton et al., 2009]

References:
Burton WN, Landy SH, Downs KE, Runken MC. The impact of migraine and the effect of migraine treatment on workplace productivity in the United States and suggestions for future research. Mayo Clin Proc 2009; 84 (5): 436–445.

Messali A, Sanderson JC, Blumenfeld AM, et al. Direct and indirect costs of chronic and episodic migraine in the United States: a web-based survey. Headache 2016; 56 (2): 306–322.